Jimmy=0
Barney=35+
Reality, I'm a closet VDW, there are 3.
I got bored with all this thread, I gave the head wankers a free reign as far as enlightening the nescient goes.
How can a factor be hidden?
Also an available fact.
On another thread I hinted at the disappearing ink nature of a hidden factor, in short, coming up to the race it's in your face obvious, 3 days after? -------
Well, it's hang-man, not that severe, you drop at 8 mistakes.
Second (no special order) factor has also been mentioned on another thread, ---------
And one more, yet to be taken seriously on any thread within this board, -----
If this doesn't spell it out,, like Guest,, I give up.

I'm sure that those willing to indulge in the required endevour will ultimately arrive at the solution if they study my last post from the heart, but, having solved VDW I must admit my preferance is to take a woman of equally vicious temperament down to the sea, drag 'er by the hair, you know that wild sex under the sun when the waves are breaking over your legs or PK, SP, no, I cant find my love in dead horses.

I got around 200-1

Bensam,

yes thanks!! was SL such a horse?

30 quid from browsers,the whole set,buy em,read em TRY and understand em,if you get to that point,and still think it,s all crap,then take the piss,until then give it a breather,you,re getting boring..

Did anybody find a vdw good thing at Sandown this evening?I think there may have been,but not 100% sure,any confirmation would be appreciated,yes or no will suffice.
Guest,by the way,thanks for previous response to my question last week.

Pipedreamer

If you are referring to the 7.10, I'd agree with you.

Pipedreamer.

I didn't find a good thing. The only horse at Sandown I had a good look at was Freya's Dream. The likely winner, but not a bet for me. She failed badly in both my filters, + the expected price. Although to be honest the price was a little better than I expected.

Be Lucky

Mtoto - I'm as sure as I can be from your posts that you make the game pay, and that ain't easy in anyones book. I do also detect though that given that yourself, or anybody else for that matter, has not specifically picked up upon the factor I know to be the one that eludes most VDW followers, you are probably not using his methods the way I do.

Speed figures are helpful and sorry if I am assuming you base too much emphasis on them, but given that you haven't, as far as I can tell, detailed just why you agree with VDWs selections then I can only guess at what other criteria you are using. I have strongly hinted at how I measure form and it works when everything lines up.

As far as Love From Verona goes, you will have already noted that he had no speed figures worth speaking of.

To some others, I will say that it is so easy to just sit on the sidelines and heckle when you haven't even put in any worthwile effort to read or understand VDWs work. The only way to learn is by ones mistakes or through others assistance based on their understanding or skills in the required area. VDW taught me how to find winners for profit, though I never met or spoke directly to him. The easiest thing in the world would have been for me to just scoff and proclaim him a trickster and waste more time following the so called experts who actually know nothing, that is why they have to be paid by tv companies or newspapers to tip winners or charge unsuspecting mugs for their tipping services.

Thanks for your lack of trust. Have you solved my post? Yesterday I had one bet, naturally it won. If VDW was serious about 80% I'm surprised, I average 92%. Of course one also backs a few with the aim of putting the bookie off the scent. I look forward to your next contribution.

i,m sorry but it,s beyond me why someone who has never read a vdw article,or even tried to understand what is involved,can come on a thread and decry something he knows nothing about as for 92% is that the percentage of time you take the p..s like i said before 30 quid from browzers easy innit..

Thanks for your continued concern. I have admitted to having read some VDW, however, horse racing selection is much like any other field, if you want to succeed it's necessary to find your own style. VDW maybe fine as a primer but you have to take responsibility yourself in the end. I think it's more productive to read T.L.Heath or Clement Doke, these are the people who can stimulate your own creativity. Anyway, I hope you get there in the end.

How's the drip 365 going investor?

Sorry to bore you further, everyone on here I consider to be my Gummy siblings and naturally I love them as a brother should, you think I'm taking the piss, fair enough, I actually think I make a constructive contribution to this thread. Anyway, I have a friend about to arrive so I haven't yet fully decided but I think Divet Hill in the 2:55 at Sedgefield is probably a bet. The only other horse I'm interested in today is Oulton Broad, Hamilton 9:10. These are common sense selections, not VDW.

Jimmy, LOL

and what did you glean from the page that you read,please tell me i,m intrigued,or better still what was the letter you read was it er..let me see an A or maybe a T or could it have been a W,nah you probably read the T twice..

Thank you for doing me the honour of addressing me by my name. If you go to Gummy site VDW you will find the material in question.

I really dont want to go into this tiresome nonsense again. Okay, VDW approach, take the principle meeting and consider the two richest races, look at the first 5/6 in the betting forecast, those with the most recent run, etc. Any and all of these pieces of advised proceedure are completely and obviously rubbish, 0.2 seconds thought to throw them out.

we,ll meet again don,t know where don,t know when (vera lynn) i bet you remember her don,t you jimmy you thorn in my side you,anyway it,s going o.k for me i got fed up cos there were too many threads giving out the same horses,so i let it go,what about your thread, i bet your on about loser 28 never read it personally,but i hope you,ve still got the shirt on yer back

Mtoto, I wanted to reply and comment on your post that mentioned myself as I fear that some misconceptions may have arisen recently, but today hasnt had enough hours in it, so I will try and catch up with you tomorrow. JIB.