Remember, the navigation above doesn't work. Use the Thread Index »
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
![]() |
<FLORENCE>
|
sorry i have just read what i wrote 3,2,1=6 not 9 what chance have i got if i cant add up
be lucky cabbie |
||
|
Big Hitter Member ![]() |
Hi....if you look down the page of system testing results you will see Stephen has posted his 80/20 lists for us to use I printed them off to refer to might make it easier ...just a thought...
Regards...... BRICK |
|||
|
<FLORENCE>
|
IBROX/BRICK i think after you have read how i see maxs system you will see i have broken no rules the way i have laid out the system is exactly has maxs way
to test my way you start at the end 1st ie look for the 80/20 it takes no time then do it the way maxs said which takes a long time you will get the same horse i did also say max has give us all the details he didnot leave anything out i think max is and will always be a star and when he comes back he will either say its right or wrong BUT no doubt you have tried to work maxs suggested way, do you really believe you could do 3 meetings like this i would doubt it, by the time you done all that your head will be spinning he gave us the tools so we are sticking to the tools we have added nothing or taken nothing away be lucky cabbie |
||
|
<FLORENCE>
|
BRICK i have not seen the list of stephens on the forum,
there was nothing wrong with maxs 80/20 list but stephens list what i got from his site is in chronicle order which speeds up the looking but remember every one it is my theory i might be proven a right pr*t but i think we all want to do maxs system if im wrong so what at least we have a starting block i have only suggested this way because max has left us be lucky cabbie |
||
|
Big Hitter Member ![]() |
Hi...click on "system Testing and Results" scroll down half way Stephen posted them March 21st I think......Im off to bed ...night night....
Regards..... BRICK |
|||
|
<FLORENCE>
|
i also forgot to tell you all the stats are free on manwairing site i have e-mailed stephen and he has replied im intersted in his race-cards tall the info will be at a click of a button, he hopes to be printing he,s cards in may he is waiting to see what saville is going to do
be lucky cabbie |
||
|
Major Player Member ![]() |
cabbie
I've been thinking along the same lines as you, why do all the work if the trainer/jockey aint on the 80/20 list. I'll have a closer look in the morn, i'm off now, been on the old fallin down water and think i'm about to fall. Cheer's Kis |
|||
|
<FLORENCE>
|
please dont forget the horses on thursday did not go through the final filters there is 2 you could not back because the trainer was out form
also we still got to get the 2nd horse for the dutch dont forget the racecourse file max supplied for us, he did not leave anything to chance so there you have it but there is still work to be done dont forget max had some strange selections we still got a lot to do but this is a start be lucky cabbie |
||
|
Member |
i like it - time will tell.
it's not true max though - is it?? ie no filtering and excluding if not in first 4 or 5 but lets see how it goes and if it needs tweeking we'll have a week till your return. spacedout |
|||
|
Major Player Member ![]() |
cabbie
Ok it looks good, but dont know if i'll have time to look at it, but i'll try. Regarding the part where you add up the last 3 placings. What are we supposed to do with the resulting figure? Have a nice hol Kis |
|||
|
Member |
placing figure comes from VDW - it's an indication of recent form - lower the better.
my initial thoughts here are that we start using form figure surely we have to start looking at how that form was obtained - ie class it ran in and opposition, hey VDW again. dunno - i still intend to pursue max method as well - he obviously profits from it, there is 52 hours in a day isn't there ??? spacedout |
|||
|
Major Player Member ![]() |
spacedout,
Cheer's and thank's for the reply. I to am going to try and follow Max's methods but cabbies idea may have something. Regarding the 52 hours in aday there needs to be! Cheer's Kis |
|||
|
Member |
Cabbie;I am not suggesting you are digressing from Max`s methods but max himself used positive discretion.An hypothetical example would be if a trainer say never had a winner for 15 days but had a winner a couple of days previously Max I am pretty sure would not disqualify his selection purely on that basis.Class was mentioned and of course this is very relevant.From memory Max indicated to run through PRW filter and this is about trainer/jockey record in class.I will only be online till Tues as my computer is causing problems and going away.I am only able to stay online just now for short periods so I am unable to check Rp site and study form online which is a bloody nuisance,but I am interested and will help if needed whwn I can.Cheers.
|
|||
|
The Hustler Member ![]() |
Hi, Everyone,
Please don't think I am trying to spoil anything on this thread, far from it, but I must agree with spaced out, that if you are going to consider form figures, you must look at what class they were obtained in or they , in my opinion, are valueless. As you know I get around 66% strike rate on my certs. None are picked with the use of form figures. Just to show you a little example of last run form figures. I have picked 9 "certs" so far that won last time out. Only 4 won. On the other hand I have picked 11 that were 4th 5th,6th,7th or 8th last time. Of these 8 won. Coupled with, in general, if your horse won last time out the odds are usually stingier than normal, because everyone likes horses that won last time out, or figs like 122 etc etc. In fact IF in a couple of months time I find my "certs" keep performing badly when they have won last time out, I might only go for ones that DID NOT win last time out. I realise it is early days and the above isn't a big sample of results, but you would tend to think winners last time out would perform better than that. A better filter may be "has the horse dropped in class?". That is one of my most important filters to me. Let's have your opinions then, I mean I don't know if you would lose too many winners if after we had done Max's filters we looked for a class drop as well. I seriouly think it as possible avenue to think about, Yours Swish |
|||
|
The Survivor Member |
A Swish/Max system,well all I can say is that the bookies better watch out,they'd better have some defence system,maybe take up Martial Arts,perhaps it would be called 'The Way Of The Andrex'!!
Q. ![]() |
|||
|
The Hustler Member ![]() |
Hello Q,
Max and I have e-mailed a few times and he is going to look at how my certs would have performed with his filters. Would we have lost or gained winners? Trouble is it takes time, of course, and now with him going away for a while.........? In the meantime it would be handy if someone could see if Max's gee gees did any better if they were dropped in class. I don't mind having a go if someone could give me a list of them all (Max's), but I just do not have time to trawl through the whole thread. I have to prepare my report of my own horses on Dutching thread, Any Volunteers? Yours Swish |
|||
|
Member |
Swish;I`ll try and do subject to computer holding out.There`s actually not many on thread from memory But I did notice 2 of the last winners were Weet A Minute at 14/s yesterday and the previous day Solomons Mine at 12`s.I would be amazed if they went through filters but this is speculation on my part.Are we talking official or simply selections? I would guess that Max`s 2 winners were fit from all weather and this may be something to ponder over the next few weeks until new season for flat settles.
|
|||
|
The Hustler Member ![]() |
Cheers Ibrox,
I aren't sure what I meant. I think I mean all the horses that have passed filters since this has been going on??? Swish |
|||
|
Member |
Swish;Do in 2/3 parts dependent on computer.Firstly,Max said system primarily for flat,and if does not pass filter use form.
|
|||
|
Powered by Eve Community | Page 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ... 30 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
|