Iv'e been rolling about on the floor for 10 minutes laughing,He backed them alright,TO LOSE.What a player he was. .That's made my night that has absolutely brilliant.
Jib Oh dear Guest hit 75% on Lays on the 80% thread.I knew he couldn't have backed that many horses to win.It's the forst time since the thread finished that i looked today.I bet he pissed himself laughing about that.Until Lee mentioned it the thought never entered my head what he had done.And nobody even battered an eyelid not even me.
Jib I'd sooner be covered in sheep shite than DUNGE.He suckered you and you didn't have a clue.I'm going to have another can of beer this is top drawer stuff.
Lee re read my post i said "if you do achieve 80% then prove it if not get off my case".I don't feel stupid at all.I would have to have a thorough look at the horses he put up as selections.It is you who is trying to make me look stupid,Which you have a knack of doing.Like i said i know far more than you think,I DON'T achieve 80% if you do like i say prove it and i'll then believe for sure that Guest wasn't bluffing.I don't fancy going through 81 bets so prove it to me then.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: investor,
And I've gone right off you Walter P!!! After Drogba went off, Chelski were awful. Couldn't keep the ball for 10 seconds. It could have been 4 or 5, so I suppose 2-1 at least gives us a glimmer of light in the otherwise dark tunnel of defeat... or is that headlights?!
In an effort to restore some sanity, a few thoughts on tomorrow's Rendlesham. Other's pre-race opinions would be welcome . Despite the weight turnaround, and all the problems it will cause the traditionalists, Patriarch Express should confirm his recent superiority, with the only possible fly in the ointment being Royal Rosa.
.
