Investor,

On my evidence you are talking absolute codswallop.

If you wish to EXCHANGE evidence then please feel free to email me, and I will prove to you that this is the case.

What are your opinions of the chap that Mtoto has referred to by the way? Do you think his posts contain much in the way of substance?

Investor,

If you dont agree with Guests selections now, why do do think that he was deceiving you then?

The very fact that you could see nothing wrong with his actions at the time suggests that the only person decieving anyone is your own goodself indulging in self-delusion.

The 80% thread exists, no doubt the current fad for deleting embarrassing threads on the other forum makes you wish you could make it vanish too, but anyone can read it and see, first Guests enthusiasm for the project, then his growing desperation as he got deeper and deeper into the red.

You may care to remember that this 80% thread was so embarassing for you all that you all went off and formed your other ill-fated forum project being unable to remain here and explain why your 'emperor' was wandering about bare-arsed.

Here we go again.

Lee
So what are you saying,That afterall Guest was not what he made himself out to be or what.I just can't believe tha anybody with his knowledge would strike 81 bets in a month using these methods.

As for the other question,It would appear that he feels he has substance in much the same way as yourself,Mtoto or anybody else who has researched the examples.Why not go over and ask him yourself.

Blackcat
Chill mate,I don't intend staying around for long don't worry.

Ladiesssss and Gen-tlemennnn

Introducing - in the red corner, weighing in at two hundred and twelve pounds, the UK's very own - Innnnnnn-vestorrrrrrr

<applause and cheering>

And in the blue corner, weighing in at two hundred and five pounds, the brazillian bomber - Johhhhhhn innnnn Bra-zilllllllll.

<applause and cheering>

And in the green corner, weighing in at two hundred and seven pounds, let's hear it for our very own - Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

<applause and cheering>

And in the orange corner, weighing in at two hundred and four pounds, the total fighting machine - emmmmmmmm-tow-towwwwwwwwww

<applause and cheering>

The contest will be of one round, and the duration of each round will be of indeterminate length.

No gouging, spitting, kicking, biting or calling each other girly names (at least, not whilst the referee's watching, anyway).

Anyone else want to join in, just climb over the ropes and get stuck in!

Seconds out... Round one <ding-ding>

Investor,

It appeared by your tone that you were 100% sure that Guest was bluffing with his selections on the 80% thread - now you don't sound so sure - why? It's worth remembering that 'Guest' (apparently) doesn't back horses any longer, but prefers instead to Lay them.

you speak the same language here as you do there.

Whatever in the world is the point of all this nonsense?

If I'm about, BC, I'll have a go at posting selections.

Lee
Are you a psychiatrist,If not stop playing mind games,If you have something to say to him then i suggest you do it on the appropriate forum.

BC,

I'm afraid I havent been able to do 205 lbs for a good many years now!

You could be wishing Lee was a psychiatrist Investor

Its a big step to move from cloud cuckoo land to the funny farm

lee
I am quite happy with the way i approach vdw.i will admit that i haven't looked at every single horse,But what i have looked at have the same traits running through them.These include all the horses in systematic betting all the horses in spells it all out,Wing and a prayer Cool gin Pegwell bay and the boxing day 12.To name but a few and it works for me at this moment in time.I have never aid that i achieve 80%.If you do achieve this figure then prove it or get of my case.

I still believe that Guest wouldn't have wagered on all those horses,Admittedly i haven't looked at the form of all the horses,But i doubt it very much that Guest would have packed up backing horses completely.

Get over to the footy thread as im sure im going to achieve a top percentage tonight.
Im telling you now that Barca will not be beat, Man U will not be beat, & Inter Milan will not be beat in the Champions League, fill yer boots.

Why not just get on Barca with me to a tune of money to beat money bags Chelski tonight.
To be honest it`s as decent an even money chance as ive seen for a long while & then some.
Im on for a monkey through the books, join in if you like.

Come on Barca!.

Investor,

My reason for posting was in response to the crap that you posted with regards to ˜Guest' and the 80% thread; I never said I had a problem with Guest.

I also never said that you've said you achieve 80% strike rate! Likewise, with regards to my own success or failure, I have NEVER said that I do, or I don't – so what's with all that then?

Walter,

If nothing else, trading the exchanges is a fantastic way of learning how to obtain the best price about your fancies.

Lee im on at the best price & if Barca dont win tonight i`ll eat my hat ala Stan Laurel.
Thirteen mins gone still 0-0.

Lee
have you actually examined what you consider the "crap"that i wrote about Guest.You know as well as i do that nobody with the knowledge that guest had would strike 81 bet a month using these methods,There was no explanation he just kept them coming,Are you saying he layed them all.Because i'm sorry i don't believe he would have backed them all.

The other point is,I said to you that i was quite happy with my findings whilst researching vdw's methods and they work o.k for me.I got the wrong end of the stick i thought by the way you were posting plus other things that you said.That you were achieving 80% at least that's the way it came accross.So we still have things to learn and you don't actually know it all,Well that's good to know because we are both in the same boat then.

0-1 to Chelski.

Lee
That would be more like it,His s/r was 25% so that means 75% lays.He did pull the wool he frigging well layed them.The crafty sod,And he never said a word.